Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 11:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3240-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 89.2
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 117
64% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 147
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 3.12
2% 3.18 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 311 316 306 260 262 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 342
Write 342
Mixed 205
SusWrite 295
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 39.2
146% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 42.9
44% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 110%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
214GB free
Firmware: 05.F1F.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 85.3
Write 90.3
Mixed 65
SusWrite 93.4
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1400, 1400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback