O.e.m Intel H81

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardO.e.m Intel H81  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3240-$54
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 70.1
38% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 92.1
8-Core 94.1
12% 93.1 Pts
64-Core 88.6
6% 88.6 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
1% 2.03 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teutons Platinum SSD 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 163 180 189 202 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 209
Write 187
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 177
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 5.4
50% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 0.3
42% 102 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$18
791GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 122 125 125 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 123
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 122
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 7.5
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel H81 Builds (Compare 824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: O.e.m Intel H81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback