HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9480m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 22DA
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160118
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	May 26 '16 at 00:12
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4310U 14,648 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 144 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 213 28% 213 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 22DA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 3.23 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 5.19 3% 4.58 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 6.48 4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB 3,024 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM01H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 22 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 26 (AA) Unknown 100 100 2288 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 8 (AE) Unknown 99 99 9 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 56 28 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	89.1% Excellent	Read 511 Write 427 Mixed 447 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 71.5 4K Mixed 22.2 114% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 20.5 62% 141 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 15.6 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.4 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9480m Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

CPU
Core i5-4310UIntelBench 49%, 14,648 samples	39x
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	30x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	74x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	5x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	4x
MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 3,024 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	6x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	5x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16