TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180525
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 02:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 180
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 327
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 71.3%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Sapphire(174B 6770) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 12.3
12% 12.5 fps
MRender 9.95
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 12.2
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 10.8%
 Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-C100/240G 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 351 374 371 374 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 421
Write 358
Mixed 318
SusWrite 359
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 13.7
94% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 26.1
61% 125 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 82%
USB DISK 16GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 10.7
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 11.6
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 7.34%
 Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 41.2%
 Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples72x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples66x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples55x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples30x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples26x
SSD
TM8PS7256G 256GBTeamBench 70%, 5,014 samples38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples17x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples9x
RAM
CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GBUnknownBench 72%, 138 samples21x
CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GBUnknownBench 69%, 136 samples17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples14x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback