Asus X580VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X580VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X580VD
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 14:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 199
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 593
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1A10) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1616
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 30.4
26% 29.2 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 22.3
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 29 22 35 8.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 123
Write 83.5
Mixed 143
SusWrite 33.7
22% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 12.1
63% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 33
53% 103 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
325GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 99 99 95 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 56
Write 88.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 94
55% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.C8FHP Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.4% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X580VD Builds (Compare 1,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X580VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback