Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory44.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180709
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 20:03
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 123
47% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 450
42% 349 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.7% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 35
21% 30.7 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 24.1
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 348 296 300 292 294 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 442
Write 424
Mixed 306
SusWrite 320
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 25.2
81% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 224
178% 248 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
443GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 386 406 399 382 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 434
Mixed 372
SusWrite 392
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 37.8
119% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 295
224% 302 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 134%
ST4000DM 006-2G5107 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 94 92 92 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62% Good
Read 187
Write 189
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 91.1
173% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
212% 2.43 MB/s
WD Elements 2TB
855GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 15 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 26
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 17.7
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
64GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 96.5
Write 59.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 13
68% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 93 91 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 49
Write 78
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 90.3
97% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
176% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 57%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
28GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
9.28% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 13.3
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 16.4
21% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.28%
Great: 16%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 93.3
Write 95.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 100
106% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 44%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
13TB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 22.8
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 11.8
26% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.1
130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CMA Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CMA Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 64GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.9% Good
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 25.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback