Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '18 at 09:12
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 127
56% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 459
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 63.2
61% 70.8 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 71.5
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 297 300 292 294 287 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 465
Write 427
Mixed 291
SusWrite 299
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 24.3
84% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 242
194% 274 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
443GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 449 441 439 444 446 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 468
Mixed 400
SusWrite 436
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 40.6
133% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 291
229% 316 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 2TB
855GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 21 21 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 35
Write 33.3
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 20.6
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 120 125 126 124 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 69.1
Write 102
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 124
128% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 57%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
13TB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 11 7 3.8 2.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 16.4
Write 15.2
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 8.1
16% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.1
128% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CMA Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CMA Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 64GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.9% Very good
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback