PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5610 (all builds) |
Memory | 44.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180709 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Oct 16 '18 at 19:48 |
Run Duration | 258 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 299 299 295 284 295 MB/s
|
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
443GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 401 398 402 393 387 MB/s
|
92.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
62.8%
Good
|
||||
WD Elements 2TB
855GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 18 21 20 22 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
64GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 92 92 91 91 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
28GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 17 MB/s
|
9.25%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 99 101 100 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
|||
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
13TB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 12 7.4 4 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 66x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 48x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 80x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 38x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $94 |