Asus EX-B250-V7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-B250-V7  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 19:46
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 503
67% 503 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 8.17
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 8.22
7% 9.36 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.43
Splatting 0.04
4% 6.24 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viva300s 240GB 240GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 321 286 286 283 284 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 410
Mixed 357
SusWrite 303
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 54.9
198% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 124
156% 278 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
447GB free
Firmware: AX005L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45% Average
Read 56.2
Write 55.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 101
43% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-B250-V7 Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-B250-V7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback