Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 02:31
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 108
56% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 325
30% 253 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 34.2
27% 30.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 30.9
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 73 80 80 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 97.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 74.5
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
156GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 82.5
Write 79.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 63
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$61
752GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 130 132 128 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 141
Write 114
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 130
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
109GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 78 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 95.2
Write 97
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 74.1
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
SDHC Card 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 12
23% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2
113% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX Adata 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.3% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 11.3
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback