Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '18 at 10:19
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 195 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 696 64% 534 Pts	64-Core 1048 65% 1048 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Lighting 72.5 Reflection 71 Parallax 99.5 59% 81 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 69 Splatting 59.1 54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 56%
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gainward(10B0 1381) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 16.3 16% 16.9 fps	MRender 22.4 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 16.1 15% 19 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 159 167 162 185 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 380 Write 261 Mixed 259 SusWrite 166 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 38 138% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 196 158% 222 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 85%
WD WD2500BEAS-00URT0 250GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 233GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 51 54 54 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 51 Write 51.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 52.7 34% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 32%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 293GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 74 68 75 73 69 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 71 Write 72 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 71 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 51%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 238GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 53 57 55 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 65.7 Write 59 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 54.3 43% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 63%
Seagate ST500DL001 HD503HI 500GB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 393GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 101 107 106 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 99 Write 27.8 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 104 51% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 59%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 93 95 94 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 19.3 Write 74 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 92.5 93% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FARG 4x4GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 25.2 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)