Lenovo 20193

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20193  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130208
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateOct 08 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 120
56% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 205
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Legend(17AA 3972) 2GB
CLim: 789 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.85% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 7
Parallax 8.81
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 9.03
Splatting 10
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SBe mSATA SSD 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 110 123 104 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 323
Write 113
Mixed 161
SusWrite 108
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 9.3
61% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 10.1
21% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 48%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
298GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 107 107 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61% Good
Read 108
Write 41.3
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 105
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 61%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V01D3SF4GB26826813 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20193 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback