Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '16 at 21:48
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$75 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 60.9 2-Core 101 54% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 278 29% 231 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% MSI(1462 3036) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.1001 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 32.9 Parallax 43.8 30% 37.9 fps	MRender 29.6 Gravity 30.9 Splatting 38.6 28% 33 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SBe mSATA SSD 120GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 87 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 79 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 30 (AD) Unknown 100 100 6356996 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 289171	33.8% Below average	Read 299 Write 77.8 Mixed 108 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 3.62 54% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 2.99 16% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 48%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 593GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 179 5891 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1868 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4092 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1204 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 107 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1760 (C2) HDA temperature 119 103 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	66.5% Good	Read 109 Write 122 Mixed 120 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.22 81% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 86%
Multiple Card Reader 64GB 1,309 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 28GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.63% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 16 Mixed 17 22% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.06 5% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.63% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 2x4GB 1,521 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.5 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	143x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	28x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	24x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	25x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	44x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	28x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16