Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T937

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK T937  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2A6
Memory14 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 01 '18 at 21:09
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7660U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 182
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 289
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Fujitsu(10CF 1959) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 24.20.100.6096
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 8.73
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 8.62
7% 8.5 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 8.17
Splatting 0.04
4% 5.75 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,154
Write 985
Mixed 862
222% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 69.7
231% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 54.5
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 417
286% 335 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$39
25GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.8
Write 12
Mixed 8.5
19% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 6.8
473% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 13.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK T937 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T937

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback