bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77KC
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$190
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.8% Good
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
71% 151 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 362
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 376
25% 376 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Zotac(19DA 1258) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
8.11% Terrible
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 29.2
7% 24.9 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 24.3
8% 24.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$150
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 136 126 131 130 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 386
Write 188
Mixed 245
SusWrite 133
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 42
150% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 214
168% 233 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 99%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 1TB
898GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 305 305 314 316 315 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63% Good
Read 322
Write 311
Mixed 253
SusWrite 308
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 26.3
80% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 156
110% 140 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$65
178GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 75 76 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 68.9
Write 69.4
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 74
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$90
894GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 96 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 65.7
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 91.7
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$93
637GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 65 70 67 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 97.9
Write 99.4
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 66.5
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 51,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $430
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $229Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $339Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback