Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 15:56
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 224
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 806
77% 635 Pts
64-Core 1,250
77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 10.2
6% 9.22 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 8.43
6% 7.56 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 42.1
33% 37.9 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 36.9
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 257 255 253 253 251 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,814
Write 1,490
Mixed 710
SusWrite 312
240% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 43
177% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,044
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 620
556% 844 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 187%
Great: 236%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
277GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 83
Write 75.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 80.5
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
862GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 129 129 129 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 60.3
Write 131
Mixed 105
SusWrite 128
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
126% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 4GB
3GB free, PID 6540
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2.8 4 4.1 4.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 3.4
3% 2.03 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 7%
General 16GB
10GB free, PID 0171
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.4 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Read 3.2
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 4.3
4% 3.12 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 47.7
MC Write 72.2
MC Mixed 52.4
164% 57.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 28
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 147%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback