Notebook P870TM_TM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870TM_TM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870TM_TM1
Memory61.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 03:33
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$443
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 279
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 917
86% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 145
Parallax 134
104% 135 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 125
Splatting 103
92% 113 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 314 318 318 318 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,510
Write 1,436
Mixed 822
SusWrite 491
289% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 80.1
266% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 895
668% 889 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 253%
Great: 280%
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB
134GB free
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 182 201 178 178 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 448
Mixed 325
SusWrite 198
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 50.1
176% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 238
201% 295 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
135GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1320 316 307 311 314 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,530
Write 1,198
Mixed 534
SusWrite 481
208% 936 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 61.3
226% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,132
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 664
590% 892 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 204%
Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
752GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 127 129 131 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 122
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 129
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
427GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 110 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 111
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870TM_TM1 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870TM_TM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback