Notebook P870TM_TM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870TM_TM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870TM_TM1
Memory61.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '18 at 22:58
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 284
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 914
87% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,139
70% 1,139 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 389.27
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 147
Parallax 125
110% 135 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 131
Splatting 108
96% 118 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1360 318 318 317 317 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,432
Write 1,116
Mixed 901
SusWrite 491
271% 1,235 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 81.7
280% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,012
767% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 260%
Great: 280%
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB
134GB free
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 181 174 185 181 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 458
Mixed 314
SusWrite 186
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 48
187% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 235
198% 290 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
135GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 490 308 309 311 316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,093
Write 1,067
Mixed 537
SusWrite 473
177% 793 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 54
224% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,061
DQ Write 1,186
DQ Mixed 852
716% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 190%
Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
752GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 130 130 130 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 29
SusWrite 129
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
427GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 111
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870TM_TM1 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870TM_TM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $264
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback