Notebook P870TM_TM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870TM_TM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870TM_TM1
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 00:32
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$443
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 915
89% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 147
Parallax 136
108% 139 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 130
Splatting 106
94% 116 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 315 318 316 317 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,487
Write 1429
Mixed 892
SusWrite 490
292% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 88.8
299% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,012
772% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 269%
Great: 280%
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1122 256GB
134GB free
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 185 185 183 180 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 478
Mixed 339
SusWrite 194
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 53.5
192% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 237
196% 282 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 98%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
135GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1334 310 311 310 313 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,387
Mixed 520
SusWrite 482
227% 1,025 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 57.4
241% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 1,232
DQ Mixed 858
726% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 221%
Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
746GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 128 129 129 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 104
Mixed 30
SusWrite 128
71% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 75%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
423GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 111
Write 86.2
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 110
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870TM_TM1 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870TM_TM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback