TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 15:02
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 132
59% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 383
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 65.9%
 Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 47.3
48% 54.4 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 54.1
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 48.2%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 525ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 82 79 80 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 142
Write 106
Mixed 112
SusWrite 79.4
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 27.8
109% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 91.5
75% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 49.1%
 Great: 73%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 130 128 130 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 130
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 75.4%
 Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 40.4%
 Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD  $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples82x
FX-8150AMD  $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples29x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples20x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples13x
SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples12x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples9x
RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples31x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $689
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback