MSI B85M-E33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI B85M-E33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 10:05
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 176
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 347
40% 310 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 465
Asus(1043 834C) 1GB
CLim: 774 MHz, MLim: 861 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 11% Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 55 48 30 50 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 457
Write 393
Mixed 354
SusWrite 94.3
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 5.9
45% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 80.4
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 1.2
59% 135 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 112 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64% Good
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
16GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 5.9 3.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.1
7% 5.62 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B85M-E33 (MS-7817) - $73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback