TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel S1200BTL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S1200BTL  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 19:55
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 179
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 455
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 71.8%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
MSI(1462 3102)
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.7
19% 20.5 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 17.5
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 18.5%
 Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 282 285 283 278 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 434
Mixed 391
SusWrite 298
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 40.6
131% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 93.3%
 Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
911GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 189 188 186 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 118
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 187
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
405GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 133 133 131 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 137
Mixed 66
SusWrite 132
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 75.7%
 Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 9965525-008.A00LF Transcend TS512MLK72V3N 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 49%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical S1200BTL Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel S1200BTL

CPU
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples11x
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel  $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples11x
Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel  $305Bench 69%, 3,748 samples5x
GPU
GTX 780Nvidia  $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples3x
GTX 560Nvidia  $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples2x
SSD
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples5x
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston  $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples3x
UltraDrive ME 128GBSuper TalentBench 27%, 62 samples3x
RAM
9965525-037.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 61 samples7x
9965525-018.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 93 samples2x
M391B5773CH0-CH9 M391B5773CH0-CH9 M391B5773CH0-YH9 M391B5773CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 7 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback