Biostar Hi-Fi H77S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi H77S  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 02:26
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 370
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0F00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.28
4% 5.12 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.57
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KFS10010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 113 106 95 85 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
242GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 100 101 90 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 173
Write 132
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 104
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 112%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
91GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 67 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 73
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 66.3
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
118GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 67 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46% Average
Read 93.9
Write 95.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 66.2
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46%
Great: 68%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB
291GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 12 17 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 17
SusWrite 16.5
25% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 99U5474-041.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi H77S Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi H77S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback