Asus PRIME H310M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '18 at 19:22
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55 15,354 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 79.1 2-Core 174 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 282 33% 257 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 42.2 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 39.8 34% 38.6 fps	MRender 40.4 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 39 32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 277GB free (System drive) Firmware: 78.06E.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 49 49 63 71 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 89.5 Write 79.7 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 58.2 53% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 250GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 94 95 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 86 Write 79.2 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 93.6 58% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 10.9 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K Builds (Compare 2,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	711x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	441x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	332x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	301x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	262x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	146x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	265x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	87x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	80x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	52x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	37x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $292

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16