Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 145-$50 3,678 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Memory 25 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 19.9 20% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 21.3 8-Core 20.9 3% 21.1 Pts	64-Core 20.5 1% 20.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 3000) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.56 1% 1.42 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 64 67 94 80 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 108 Write 83 Mixed 27 SusWrite 71.4 52% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-026.A00LF 6GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 533, 533 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 3.3 6% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 286 14% 286 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	6x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	5x
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	12x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	2x
I T LCS-128L9S 128GBLiteonBench 72%, 3 samples	2x

RAM
99U5471-001.A00LF Corsair CML4GX3M1A1600C9 6GBKingstonBench 25%, 5 samples	2x
9905402-532.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 676 samples	2x
2x8GBSamsungBench 62%, 17,576 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28