ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision 3510

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Dell Precision 3510 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 00D283
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 04 '16 at 19:02
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ondrarob
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 33,920 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 113 2-Core 214 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 567 57% 465 Pts	64-Core 568 35% 568 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 06E0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4390 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.16% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 13.4 Parallax 13.5 6% 11.2 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 15.3 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 M.22 512GB 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 122 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 105 (64) Unknown 100 100 392428 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 48 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 3 (B2) Unknown 100 100 30 (B3) Unknown 100 100 303 (B4) Unknown 100 100 8529 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 50 0 81608835122 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1458 (F1) Unknown 100 100 332 (F2) Unknown 100 100 347 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 100 0	99% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 467 Mixed 485 110% 490 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 25.2 119% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 45.1 110% 229 MB/s

TOSHIBA MK3276GSX 320GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 104GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 42.4 Write 56.7 Mixed 9.47 45% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.3 63% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 20,956 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 22.2 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 23.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision 3510 Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 3510

CPU
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples	434x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	70x
Core i5-6440HQIntelBench 66%, 4,172 samples	51x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	583x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	29x
Radeon R9 M360AMDBench 9%, 1,374 samples	11x

SSD
X400 M.2 2280 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 11,716 samples	10x
hynix SC308 SATA 512GBSKBench 78%, 1,969 samples	10x
1100 SATA 512GBMicronBench 80%, 5,508 samples	10x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	85x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	62x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 4,454 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback