Dell Precision 3510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 3510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 00D283
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '16 at 17:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 164
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 501
48% 396 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 06E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4390
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 6.88
5% 7.39 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 14.1
8% 9.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 M.22 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.9% Excellent
Read 512
Write 458
Mixed 473
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 22.5
95% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 45
100% 206 MB/s
TOSHIBA MK3276GSX 320GB
104GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 42.7
Write 55
Mixed 28.5
54% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.31
61% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 3510 Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 3510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback