Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '18 at 02:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 205
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 533
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 042A) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 49.1
33% 41.8 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 41.7
30% 35.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNOW 30GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AJXA0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 34 37 34 38 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 160
Write 54.5
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 37.4
17% 79 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 9.1
33% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 6.8
DQ Write 21.7
DQ Mixed 8.9
8% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 04CB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 53.3
75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback