Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 05:35
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 96.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 187
79% 132 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 536
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 042A) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 48.9
6% 30.9 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 41.7
30% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNOW 30GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AJXA0202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 51.8
Mixed 60.8
18% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 8.3
38% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 6.4
DQ Write 21.7
DQ Mixed 9.7
9% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 04CB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback