Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 13:35
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 400
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 45% Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 236 231 233 235 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 329
Write 208
Mixed 184
SusWrite 227
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 11.2
56% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 23.1
DQ Mixed 33
34% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 86%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
142GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 245 209 163 242 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.2% Good
Read 254
Write 180
Mixed 198
SusWrite 220
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 29.9
98% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 151
127% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 99%
Liteonit LMT-64M6M mSATA 64GB
5GB free
Firmware: DM6110F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 252
Write 158
Mixed 168
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 26.7
93% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 129
109% 158 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
796GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 101 100 96 101 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 98.2
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 70%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
16GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 56 53 54 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 37.1
Write 66.9
Mixed 40
SusWrite 53.4
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 95 97 97 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 105
Write 89.4
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 95.6
110% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
171% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
2.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 73 78 78 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 160
Write 108
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 75.8
124% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 73%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
637GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 22 72 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 6.5
Write 96.6
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 64.2
78% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.1
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $698
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback