Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 04:48
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 384
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 45% Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 227 227 227 229 228 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 311
Write 223
Mixed 180
SusWrite 224
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 11.4
58% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.3
DQ Write 22.9
DQ Mixed 34.4
32% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 86%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
142GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 238 205 157 233 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.2% Good
Read 248
Write 226
Mixed 207
SusWrite 213
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 30.6
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 150
126% 184 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 99%
Liteonit LMT-64M6M mSATA 64GB
5GB free
Firmware: DM6110F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 244
Write 159
Mixed 164
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 28.1
98% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 130
109% 158 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
796GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 89 91 99 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 100
Write 107
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 91.4
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
155% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55%
Great: 70%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
16GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 48 47 58 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 68
Write 48.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 50.5
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 96 97 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 100
Write 90.2
Mixed 66
SusWrite 95.5
118% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
2.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 74 73 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 154
Write 114
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 73.7
123% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 73%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
643GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 26 23 57 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 1
Write 106
Mixed 1
SusWrite 47
62% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $698
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback