Acer Aspire M7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M7810  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FMP55
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091215
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '18 at 19:13
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 74
2-Core 148
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 370
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 61.9
56% 66.6 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 55.3
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 224 217 133 91 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.5% Above average
Read 254
Write 247
Mixed 224
SusWrite 154
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 29
100% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 148
125% 181 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 118%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 63 62 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 68.7
Mixed 49
SusWrite 63.1
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78
512GB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 82 84 90 84 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 85.5
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 75%
WD WD3000JS-60PDB0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 57.7
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 57.8
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 34%
WD WD3000JS-60PDB0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 57
Write 55
Mixed 41
SusWrite 57.8
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 34%
SECURE Secure USB 2GB
2GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 0.2 6.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.75% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 6
12% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 1600 C7 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M7810 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $478
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback