Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 15:35
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 895
79% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.6% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 55
30% 49.3 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 48.4
40% 48.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1913 1916 1905 1925 1927 1936 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 1,941
Mixed 898
SusWrite 1,920
408% 1,828 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 72.3
255% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 954
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 858
653% 882 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 338%
Great: 353%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
930GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 104 102 104 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 27.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 26.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback