Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '18 at 02:00
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 128 58% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 430 43% 350 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 32.1 28% 30.9 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 32.6 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 38 36 39 37 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.8% Below average	Read 144 Write 120 Mixed 100 SusWrite 42.1 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 10.2 76% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 52.9 DQ Mixed 9.7 16% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 83%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 15GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 39 37 39 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 68.5 Write 67.5 Mixed 52 SusWrite 43.5 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 466GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.1 7 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.41% Terrible	Read 6.2 Write 7 Mixed 6.2 SusWrite 7.1 9% 6.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.41% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	538x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	256x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	158x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	450x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	262x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	225x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369