bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 17:39
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 169
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 318
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 59.1
54% 63.7 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 65
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 15 84 40 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 338
Write 174
Mixed 199
SusWrite 55.9
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
25% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
131GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 111 108 111 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61% Good
Read 104
Write 82.2
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 109
62% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
120GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 17 85 40 83 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 37
Mixed 56
SusWrite 57.1
38% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G JM1600KLH-8G 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.1
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback