Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 08:34
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 185
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 454
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 24.2
22% 24.5 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 22
Splatting 28
20% 23.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 132 128 123 123 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 322
Write 212
Mixed 233
SusWrite 132
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 31.1
100% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 101
77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 57%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 266 272 269 272 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 369
Mixed 384
SusWrite 283
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 238
210% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE6400 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 140 138 139 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 134
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 139
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE6400 4TB
118GB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 131 131 132 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 132
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 91%
ICY BOX0 IB-124CL-U3 1TB
294GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 41 84 39 60 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
Read 72.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 47.2
88% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 27 25 54 45 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 94
Write 86.2
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 44
93% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.6
270% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C8 86D3 SP008GBLTU160N01 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback