Hasee GI5S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHasee GI5S  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170927
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 14:28
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 599
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 103C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9811
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 30
Parallax 35.3
34% 35.6 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 33.7
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SM280128GPTCB2T-S112610 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 67 59 62 61 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 446
Write 290
Mixed 293
SusWrite 90.5
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 30.6
140% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 165
150% 226 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
777GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 104 109 109 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 142
Write 80.3
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 107
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.6
244% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GI5S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Hasee GI5S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback