Biostar G41D3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar G41D3+  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 17:03
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5700-$22
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 81.9
42% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 80.9
8-Core 82.8
11% 81.9 Pts
64-Core 82.9
5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Biostar(1565 110A) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.56
0% 0.54 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 0.78
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 100 111 120 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 95
Write 24.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 112
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 109 4GB
3GB free, PID 1662
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.1 4.1 4.5 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Read 28
Write 1.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.9
10% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41D3+ Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar G41D3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback