Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 02:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 137
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 388
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 38.3
38% 42.6 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 35.5
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 71 64 64 69 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 447
Write 400
Mixed 337
SusWrite 102
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 28.4
95% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 44.9
DQ Mixed 117
66% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 118%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
19GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 56 50 50 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 62.7
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 53.9
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA380 320GB
39GB free
Firmware: ST2OA3BB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 69 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 79.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 66.4
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
43GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 127 131 131 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 116
Write 145
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 127
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.3
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-8GK 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback