Gigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H270N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 09:47
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 261
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 508
68% 511 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 72
Parallax 70.3
57% 70.6 fps
MRender 75.1
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 57.6
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTD256HAGL-00000 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT22L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 158 169 195 203 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 427
Write 168
Mixed 156
SusWrite 182
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 19.5
101% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 62
99% 195 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 79%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
954GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 463 453 454 449 449 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 472
Mixed 373
SusWrite 454
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 53.1
190% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Apricorn 512GB
226GB free
Firmware: 0128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 202 190 195 194 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 209
Write 201
Mixed 196
SusWrite 195
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 24.2
79% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 24.9
20% 28 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 3.9 5 4.8 4.9 5.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 96.5
Write 28.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 5
34% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback