Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 00:24
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$192
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 264
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 730
73% 596 Pts
64-Core 1309
81% 1309 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 207
Parallax 188
154% 195 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 189
Splatting 130
122% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1132 1588 1455 963 1643 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,238
Write 1,804
Mixed 878
SusWrite 1,370
351% 1,573 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62
212% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 936
709% 954 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 282%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
152GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 376 469 427 284 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 491
Mixed 406
SusWrite 412
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 65.1
219% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
174GB free
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1592 1431 1377 1558 906 1456 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,841
SusWrite 1,387
391% 1,739 MB/s
4K Read 163
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 154
523% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 1116
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 1,048
790% 1,058 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 376%
Great: 559%
ICY BOX IB-117-U31 250GB
155GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 288 278 319 190 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 413
Write 410
Mixed 366
SusWrite 293
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 33.4
100% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 189
137% 176 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST500DM002-1BD142 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 188 205 180 120 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 190
Write 164
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 180
101% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 29.7
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,252
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback