Dell Vostro 230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Vostro 230  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07N90W
Memory0.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101209
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 08:52
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 72.8
42% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 77.5
8-Core 73.4
10% 75.4 Pts
64-Core 73.9
5% 73.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Dell(1028 043E) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.61 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.87
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 126 204 219 200 221 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS724040KLSA80 400GB-$133
139GB free
Firmware: KFAOAC6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Read 4
Write 34.7
Mixed 3
SusWrite 2.7
8% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
70GB free
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 83.5
Write 84.2
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 3.1
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 54%
Buffalo VIRTUAL-DISK 1.5TB
186GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.6 7.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 14.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 7.6
15% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 16%
Buffalo VIRTUAL-DISK 1.5TB
219GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.2 7.4 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 42.2
Write 14.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 7.5
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vostro 230 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback