HP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 07:38
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1585L v5
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 204
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 566
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 105GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 4,337
Write 3,655
Mixed 4499
930% 4,164 MB/s
4K Read 193
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 170
602% 179 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 989
744% 990 MB/s
IM2S33D4 120GB
106GB free
Firmware: E006
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 481
Write 73
Mixed 180
53% 245 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 32
117% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 110
88% 124 MB/s
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
225GB free
Firmware: AAGA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,707
Write 755
Mixed 1,091
261% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 48.1
166% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 752
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 614
520% 753 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 193%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 853289-091 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2600 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 23.3
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 20.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback