HP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '18 at 10:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1585L v5
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 196
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 589
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 235GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.3 11 9.6 9.6 8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
Read 201
Write 246
Mixed 232
SusWrite 9.5
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 32.2
113% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 45.7
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 55.7
55% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 56%
YP0240GWCHA 240GB
154GB free
Firmware: HPEMS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 122 167 143 143 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67% Good
Read 326
Write 245
Mixed 275
SusWrite 141
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 33.5
118% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 160
131% 184 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 853289-091 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 54
MC Mixed 25.1
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 22.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback