HP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 22:06
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1585L v5
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 295
40% 295 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
YP0240GWCHA 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPEMS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 195 187 195 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 301
Write 249
Mixed 257
SusWrite 189
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 30
109% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 170
137% 190 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 853289-091 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
106% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 23.7
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 17.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback