HP Omen 880-149 Desktop Rfrbd PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Omen 880-149 Desktop Rfrbd PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 19:42
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 118
51% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 366
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 103
Parallax 85.5
75% 93.7 fps
MRender 84.7
Gravity 86.5
Splatting 90.1
72% 87.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 281 279 275 274 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 2,072
Write 1,284
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 311
260% 1,176 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 56.7
182% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 536
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 480
348% 456 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 179%
Great: 235%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
676GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 441 439 429 455 454 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 407
Write 457
Mixed 366
SusWrite 442
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 29.6
118% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 240
209% 312 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 110 112 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 126
Write 130
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 117
71% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
105% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 108%
HP Photosmart Prem 2GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.37% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.9
8% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB
2133, 2667, 2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Omen 880-149 Desktop Rfrbd PC Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

System: HP Omen 880-149 Desktop Rfrbd PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $790
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback