MSI MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Z390 Gaming Infinite X Plus 9 (MS-B916)
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00)  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 07:59
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 258
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 890
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,464
91% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 188
Parallax 217
160% 201 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 194
Splatting 151
155% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 147%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 823 645 565 577 562 552 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 2,100
Write 1,726
Mixed 1,268
SusWrite 621
318% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 50.7
165% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 738
552% 741 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 206%
Great: 332%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
68GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 344 371 298 245 221 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 386
Mixed 353
SusWrite 294
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 39.7
134% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
276GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 126 79 283 76 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 364
Write 80.8
Mixed 118
SusWrite 146
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 17.3
78% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 107
87% 126 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 24.6
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 26.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00) Builds (Compare 1,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback