Asrock B365M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 20:55
Run Duration395 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 808
78% 639 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.8% Very good
Lighting 93.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 118
76% 106 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 94.5
77% 94.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$135
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 407 438 441 444 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 364
Write 316
Mixed 312
SusWrite 386
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 20.5
71% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 113
146% 264 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 119%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
33GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 46 164 389 313 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 468
Write 333
Mixed 430
SusWrite 204
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 34.1
111% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 169
180% 299 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 129%
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
121GB free
Firmware: 80000C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 351 353 355 355 354 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 958
Write 564
Mixed 765
SusWrite 348
147% 659 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 35
115% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 360
307% 436 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 164%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 422 420 398 414 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 393
Write 401
Mixed 354
SusWrite 385
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 37.6
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 150
141% 215 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
46GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 153 158 158 154 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 143
Write 97.1
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 146
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
457GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 140 136 138 138 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 153
Write 19.2
Mixed 80
SusWrite 123
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 112%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
522GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 57 113 108 113 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 182
Write 131
Mixed 111
SusWrite 84.4
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback