ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 49Y6512

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	IBM 49Y6512 (all builds)
Memory	61 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '19 at 07:28
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5530 771 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 59.8 2-Core 121 55% 87.7 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 336 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 566 35% 566 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 159GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 22 17 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 49 Write 23.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 21.2 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 54% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 42%
Toshiba MBF2600RC 600GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 559GB free Firmware: 5704 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 150 151 151 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 150 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.3 251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 85%
Ibm-esxs MBF2600RC 600GB 559GB free Firmware: SB24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 150 152 151 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.7% Excellent	Read 154 Write 138 Mixed 77 SusWrite 151 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.9 209% 1.8 MB/s

Lsilogic Logical Volume 599GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 558GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 53 54 54 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.6% Above average	Read 147 Write 53.3 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 53.6 59% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 108%
Ibm-esxs MBF2300RC 300GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 279GB free Firmware: SB2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 55 54 54 54 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.3% Above average	Read 151 Write 52.3 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 55.9 60% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 59%
Ibm-esxs CBRCA146C3ETS0 N 147GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 137GB free Firmware: C370 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.5% Above average	Read 129 Write 51 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 50.1 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 171% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16x4GB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 16 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.5 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback