ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM System x3200 -[4363PBS]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	IBM System x3200 -[4363PBS]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM M31IX
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070612
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '20 at 21:04
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 3040 79 User benchmarks, average bench 35% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 37 32% 42.5 Pts	4-Core 40.6 8-Core 34.9 5% 37.8 Pts	64-Core 41.5 3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 79 65 66 65 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.2% Below average	Read 201 Write 161 Mixed 155 SusWrite 71.5 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 20.3 82% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 57.4 DQ Mixed 24.6 24% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 105GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 82.4 Write 42.5 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 92.3 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 59%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 500GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 341GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30% Poor	Read 79 Write 26.7 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 25.5 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 85%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 159GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 42GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 38.7 Write 22.6 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 27.7 21% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 42%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 193GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 80 65 66 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 115 Write 117 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 71.9 64% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback